Kamus vicky.. (kaskus+ane tambahin)
Upah = Kristalisasi Keringat
Idiot= impoten intelegensi
Makan = absorbsi nutrisi padat
Minum = absorbsi nutrisi cair
BAB = mobilisasi eksternal residu makanan
Mandi = waterisasi ragawi
Mimpi = visualisasi tak sadar diri
Nonton = visualisasi sadar diri
Kaya = superioritas kemakmuran
Kere = ketidakmampuan ekonomikal secara absolut
Membaca = interpretasi himpunan abjad
Selingkuh = konspirasi kesetiaan cinta
Pacaran = harmonisasi dua hati
Gila = disorientasi rasionality
Narsis = eksistensi statusisasi
Ngupil = eksplorasi alat nafas diri
Gaptek = mempertakut teknologi.
Keramas = sterilisasi rambut
Kecetit = labilisasi tulang
Ngaji = harmonisasi hati
Tidur = Hibernasi Jangka Pendek!
Koma = Hibernasi Jangka Panjang!
Online = Aktivasi dunia maya
Nikah = Asimilasi dan Akulturasi dua Individu
Kuliah = Studisasi Tingkat tinggi
Ulang tahun = Inflasi Your Age
Haus = Dehidrasi ion tubuh
Senin, 16 September 2013
Kamis, 27 Juni 2013
TUGAS FINAL ENGLISH _46110001
Model Of Logit OR Ohlson Method In Analysis Of Bankcrupty
By:
Name: Bahri
Nim: 461 10 001
Class: 3A/D4
ACCOUNTING DEPARTEMENT
POLITECHNIC OF UJUNG PANDANG
2013
ANALYSIS
OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY PREDICTION
1. ABOUT
METHOD OLHSON
The purpose of this chapter
is to provide an understanding of how to conduct an analysis of corporate
bankruptcy prediction. Analysis of a company's chances of bankruptcy is
considered important for a company. This is analysis not only healthy companies
alone but the companies that are considered healthy. This analysis was
conducted as a follow preventive for healthy companies and is curative for
companies that are not healthy. This analysis includes the use of bankruptcy prediction
models which include: Unvariate models and Multivariate models.
To predict the chances
of bankruptcy of a company in terms of financial aspects that can be used
multivariate models using olhson or logit models.
How about is Ohlson
method?
The Ohlson
method is analysis that the develop by James A. Ohlson.This method was
developed from the results of research conducted by Ohlson.
From research it, Ohlson
found nine (9) ratio is the best used to measure the level of company
bankcrupty
1. Gnp To Total Asset (SIZE)
2. Total Liabilities To Total Assets=TLTA
3. Current Assets-Current Liabilities To Total Assets = WCTA
4. Current Liabilities To Current Assets = CLCA
5. Net Income To Total Assets = NITA
6. Funds From Operations To Total Liabilities = FUTL
7. One If Net Income Was Negative For The Last Two Years And Zero Otherwise = INTWO
8. One If Total Liabilities Exceed Total Asset And Zero Otherwise = OENEG
9. CHIN
2. EXPLANATION ABOUT NINE RATIO
a) Word Logaritma (ln) total assets deflator GNP (natural log of total assets to GNP implicit price deflator indeks = SIZE
EXAMPLE: Calculation SIZE (sample PT GrazindoTbk)
Year
|
GNP Deflator*
|
Total Assets
|
SIZE
|
2011
|
29,556,683.81
|
10,204,495
|
2,90
|
2012
|
32,371,459.18
|
10,836,554
|
2,99
|
*data hipotesis
Per Capita Gross National Product, 2007-2012 (Rupiahs)
b) (Total Liabilities To Total Assets = TLTA)
EXAMPLE: calculation TLTA (Sampel PT Grazindo Tbk)
Year
|
Total liabilities
|
Total assets
|
TLTA
|
2011
|
1,778,337
|
10,204,495
|
0,174
|
2012
|
2,094,469
|
10,836,554
|
0,193
|
c) current assets-current liabilities to total assets = WCTA
EXAMPLE: calculation WCTA (Sampel PT Grazindo Tbk)
Year
|
Total current assets
|
Current Liabilities
|
Total assets
|
WCTA
|
2011
|
1,886,387
|
1,440,351
|
10,204,495
|
0,044
|
2012
|
1,880,127
|
1,644,178
|
10,836,554
|
0,022
|
d) current liabilities to current assets = CLCA
EXAMPLE: calculation CLCA (Sampel PT Grazindo Tbk)
Year
|
CURRENT liabilities
|
Total Current assets
|
CLCA
|
2011
|
1,440,351
|
1,886,387
|
0,764
|
2012
|
1,644,178
|
1,880,127
|
0,874
|
e) Net income to total assets = NITA
EXAMPLE: calculation NITA (Sampel PT Grazindo Tbk)
Year
|
Net Income
|
Total Assets
|
NITA
|
2011
|
682,230
|
10,204,495
|
0,067
|
2012
|
390,583
|
10,836,554
|
0,036
|
f) Funds from operations to total liabilities = FUTL
EXAMPLE: calculation FUTL (Sampel PT Grazindo Tbk)
Year
|
Funds from operations
|
Total liabilities
|
NITA
|
2011
|
1,104,109
|
1,778,337
|
0,620
|
2012
|
233,475
|
2,094,469
|
0,111
|
g) One if net income was negative for the last two years and zero otherwise = INTWO
based on the Income Statement by PT Astra Agro Lestari Tbk showed that during the year 2011 and 2012, the company net profit, so that the value of the variable is 0 INTWO.
h) One if total liabilities exceed total asset and zero otherwise = OENEG
Based on the balance of PT Astra Agro Lestari Tbk showed that during the year 2011 and 2012, total liabilities from total assets smaller, so the value of the variable OENEG is 0
i) (Net profit this year- Net profit last year )
(|net profit this year| + |net profit last year|) = CHIN
EXAMPLE: calculation FUTL (Sampel PT Grazindo Tbk)
Year
|
Net profit this year- Net profit last year
|
Net profit this year+Net profit last year
|
CHIN
|
2012
|
390,583
|
390,583
|
-
|
2011
|
682,230
|
682,230
|
-
|
-291,647
|
1,072,813
|
-0,271
|
Based on the results of a calculation of financial ratios each predictor variable as shown in the above it can be calculated multivariate function of PT Astra Agro Lestari Tbk
Calculation of Multivariate Functions Ohlson Model Year 2012
(PT Astra Agro Lestari Tbk)
Variabel
|
Koefisien Variabel Predictor
|
Variabel Predictor
Value
|
Multivariat (y)
|
Konstanta
|
-1,32
|
-1,32
| |
SIZE
|
-0,407
|
2,99
|
-1,217
|
TLTA
|
6,03
|
0,193
|
1.164
|
WCTA
|
-1,43
|
0,022
|
-0,0315
|
CLCA
|
0,0757
|
1,114
|
0,843
|
NITA
|
-2,37
|
0,036
|
-0,085
|
FUTL
|
-1,83
|
0,111
|
-0,203
|
INTWO
|
0,285
|
0
|
0
|
OENEG
|
-1,72
|
0
|
0
|
CHIN
|
-0,521
|
-0,271
|
0.141
|
Total
|
-0,875
| ||
Furthermore, based on multivariate function (y) can be calculated the probability of bankruptcy PT Astra Agro Lestari Tbk as shown as follows:
Description:
P is the chance of bankruptcy
E is the logarithm value 2.718282
Y is a multivariate function
Based on the results of these calculations it can be concluded that PT Astra Agro Lestari Tbk in 2012 is not likely to go bankrupt because the probability is less than 3.8% which is only 0.3169%.
3. ASSESMENT CRITERIA
Cutt off point = 3.8%. If P> 3.8% means the company likely to bankrupt
If P <or equal to 3.8% means the chances of a small bankrupt
The All Data, Take From Obtained From Above Report Below
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
Postingan
